Machete

Your Tourist of Terror was pleasantly surprised by the post today!  Nothing better than finding new releases in your mailbox the same day they come out for public consumption.  What a treat it was:  Robert Rodriguez's Machete, starring my favorite B-movie Actor Danny Trejo and a few other faces you may know.

The character Machete was first introduced to audiences in 2001's Spy Kids and it's sequels.  No it wasn't in the faux no longer trailer included in 2007's Grindhouse double feature, but a series of children's movies from the same director.  Given the contents of the film itself and aforementioned trailer, its hard to believe.  However, given Rodriguez's sense of humor it fits.  If you still don't believe, watch the kiddie movies... if you dare.

Machete tells the story of the self-titled ex- Mexican Federale portrayed Mr. Trejo, as he gets hired on as a day laborer... to execute a senator.  In true old school grindhouse fashion this all goes horrible awry, as he gets betrayed, abused and then seeks retribution on an epic scale.  As the tagline says- if hire Machete to kill the bad guys, you better pray the bad guy isn't you.  Indeed, they just fucked with the wrong Mexican.

Certainly worth the 2 bits, the only sad thing is your old Tourist regrets not seeing this during it's theatrical release.  The sticky floors of the cinema and the smuggled in liquor would've only added to the old school grindhouse ambiance... and if only I would've been able to catch it at a drive-in as a double bill (maybe w/ Predators to add to Rodriguez flair).  Alas, but a dream.

The Tourist's verdict-  Go out of your way to check it out.  Worth the price of admission and then some.  Rife with action, violence, sex and some star studded cameos.  Just don't forget to bring your own stale popcorn and booze.  

Blu-ray Vs. DVD: It’s Your Choice, FOR NOW!

The Blu-ray vs. DVD debate brings to mind something one of my dear friends once said about digital downloads when they entered the music industry:  It looks like they found a way to make us buy the White Album again.  That’s how I feel about the Blu-ray industry, it looks like they found away to make me buy the Star Wars Trilogy again...  And I don’t like it.

Please don’t misunderstand me.  I know a Blu-ray disc can hold approximately ten times the amount of data that a DVD can.  That alone is astounding for the computing and gaming industries, and it also benefits film as well.   You can offer more special features on one Blu-ray as opposed to a multiple DVD disc release.  I can also understand the advantage of a true High Definition format for better sound and picture quality, and Blu-ray may be better quality than DVD… But I don’t see too much of a noticeable difference.

Since Blu-ray can support the new 3D technologies and the former media is unable to offer a true 3D experience without using anaglyph images (the old Red and Blue), Blu-ray is a step-up from DVD.  Especially when genre vets such as James Cameron are touting that digital 3D will be the new dominate format in movies going forward. Which I doubt since reports are starting to trickle in about 3D technology’s damaging side effects to vision for prolonged viewers.  Also, when 3D technology first came out in the early 50’s it was heralded as the new way of cinema.  Despite a brief revival in the 80’s and recently, you can already attest that those statements were far from true.  But I digress, with more films and theatres going into the age of digital and 3D eventually Blu-ray will win the war.   For now, there is a choice.  Take advantage of it while you can.

There are many opinions and articles out there on the topic of Blu-ray versus DVD, most of which favoring the Blu-ray side.  Many attempt to compare a previous DVD release to its newer format counterpart.   A comparison is always ideal to reveal many faults and benefits of one media versus another…. But many of these commentaries forget to mention a few variables.  For example, when was the reviewed DVD released versus the Blu-ray?  Was it before, after or was it simultaneously?  If, for example the DVD was released many years before the Blu-ray and the studio never felt the need to update the prior format, of course the Blu Ray will be better by comparison.  This is just one of many factors missing in these critiques.

Another item not explored is how the DVD was released in comparison to the Blu-ray edition.  Was the DVD released with the film and all its special features crammed into one little disc or was the film and special features in their own individual discs?  This matters a great deal when comparing a DVD to a Blu-ray release.  Blu-ray has about 50 gigabytes of storage space and a single dual layered DVD only has 7.  If you try to cram everything into one DVD, there is going to be a variation in the quality of sound and picture when compared to the new format.  However, if it’s the film alone on one DVD with some minor menus and options, the quality should be almost on par with its foil.  

While on the subject of Special Features, except for cinephiles like me, the populace at large could care less about them.  Maybe a few individuals would enjoy an alternate version or ending to the film as well as a few deleted scenes, but many don’t want to interrupt their illusion with making-of and what-could-have-been features.  Most people are just satisfied with two hours of cinematic escapism with no extras.  Even I do not find myself drawn into purchasing a Blu-ray or a DVD based on its extra contents alone, and I’m sure much of the general public thinks the same.

Recently, I’ve had the opportunity to sit down with the following copies of Sam Raimi’s Army of Darkness and watch them back to back:

1.)    Army of Darkness: Screwhead Edition Blu-ray (2009)

2.)    Army of Darkness: Screwhead Edition DVD (2009)

3.)    Bruce Campbell Vs. The Army of Darkness: Directors Cut, Official Bootleg Edition DVD (2001)

4.)    Army of Darkness DVD (2000)

Here’s what I found out by watching different versions of the same film on different formats:

1.)    The Screwhead Editions (both DVD and Blu-ray) had better picture and sound quality than previous releases of Army of Darkness; however they were skimpy in comparison to prior versions in Special Features & content.  The alternate version as shown in the Official Bootleg would have been a welcomed addition in the Screwheads.

2.)    When the Screwhead Editions were compared to one another, the Blu-ray does have better resolution in picture and sound quality but it is not much of a noticeable difference to this viewer.  The very slight pixelization of the DVD variant is the result of the Studio trying to compress all the content onto one disc, instead of multiple.  It looks better on Blu-ray because the film and features have more room without any unnecessary compression.  However, it’s only a slight variation in quality between the two and hardly noticeable to a casual viewer.

What have I learned from my little experiment of watching Army of Darkness back to back?  I’m still going to stick with the DVD version while I can as long as it’s a multiple disc edition as opposed to a single.  Why?  Well for starters, I’m cheap and Blu-ray discs cost anywhere between $10.00 and $15.00 more than the prior format.  Also, most Blu-ray players are backwards compatible and they upscale the picture and sound quality of a DVD.  Of course there’s only so much they can do to improve on a DVD.  Even if said release is on Blu-ray, it may not be much better than the former format because the studio may not have had the best source materials (like the original negative) to work with.

For me, I’m sticking with DVD until the studios completely drop the format in light of all their concerns over illegal reproduction.  Besides, Blu-ray may have won the Format Battle with HD DVD… But it’s still struggling for dominance against digital downloads and the burden of new home 3D technologies.  Eventually it will win the war and DVD will go the way of the VHS dinosaur.  Until then you have a choice, my friends.  I say stick with the DVD… and forgo re-buying The White Album or Star Wars for now.

The Exterminator

"Another day, another dollar," Miles Branson sighs while taking another slug of his cup of coffee from within his black Pest-Con van.

Gliding into the client's driveway, the large new home looms over him as he reviews his work order. Miles almost laughs when he remembers what he told them was the probable cause of their current woes: raccoons or possums in their root cellar. He shrugs, since it's easier for people to accept the lie when the truth is impossible to swallow.

The work order and initial consultation with the client, to the trained eye, tell a different story. Raccoons or possums don't leave 2-foot wide waste trails that light up neon blue under a luma-wand. Neither species could be responsible for the disappearance of large household pets, livestock or children. Of course, the old abandoned graveyard less than a mile away didn't help matters.

Hence the need for the lie. It was easy for the client to blame raccoons and possums since the majority of the loud noises reported occuredat night. Also, easy to have the client leave their new home for several days under the guise of a rabies scare. It might take awhile for Miles to eliminate the true pest if they had set up a nest in the residence, but it could also get real ugly.

Unlike their portrayal in modern entertainment, the real animal in question wasn't handsome or beautiful. They weren't hopeless romantics who sparkle in the sunlight or misguided souls worthy of redemption. The true beast reeks of earth and centuries-old decay from the life essence stolen from many over the decades. Under his breath, Miles curses both Anne Rice and Stephenie Meyer for humanizing these demons made flesh.

Retrieving from the back of his van a flamethrower, crossbow with silver bolts and an axe; Miles hopes this doesn't sour his new client's taste for the town.

Berkeley Springs is a nice place to live If it weren't for all the vampires.